Consciousness theory slammed as ‘pseudoscience’ — sparking uproar
- NEWS
- 20 September 2023
Researchers publicly call out theory that they say is not well supported by science, but that gets undue attention.
A letter, signed by 124 scholars and posted online last week, has caused an uproar in the consciousness-research community. It argues that a prominent theory describing what makes someone or something conscious — called the integrated information theory (IIT) — should be labelled as pseudoscience. Since its publication on 15 September in the preprint repository PsyArXiv1, the letter has resulted in some researchers arguing over the label and others worrying that it will increase polarization in a field that has grappled with issues of credibility in the past.
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
199,00 € per year
only 3,90 € per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02971-1
References
Fleming, S. et al. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zsr78 (2023).
Cogitate Consortium et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.546249 (2023).
Yaron, I. et al. Nature Hum. Behav. 6, 593–604 (2022).
Related Articles
[
Decades-long bet on consciousness ends — and it’s philosopher 1, neuroscientist 0](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02120-8)[
Decoding the neuroscience of consciousness](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02207-1)[
If AI becomes conscious: here’s how researchers will know](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02684-5)[
Can lab-grown brains become conscious?](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02986-y)